MGT 622

Management of Technical Professionals

Summer 2008

 

Instructor:            

                              J. Daniel Sherman, Ph.D.

Office Hours:                 9:00am-6:00pm Mon-Fri

Office:                       102D Administrative Science Building

Phone:                        824-6058

Email:                        shermand@uah.edu

 

Reading Assignments:          MGT 622 Course readings are available at Currie Systems, 3089 Leeman Ferry Rd. SE.

 

Course Notes:                 Lecture outlines are available on the Web at http://cba.uah.edu/shermand/

 

Course Description: Differences in the nature of the research and development functions and in the skills required of engineers and scientists create special problems for the manager.  This course examines important issues in managing engineers, scientists, and technical support personnel.  However, the topics covered in MGT 622 are relevant to the management of professionals in general.  Specific topics include: factors influencing technological innovation, organizational design issues in R&D, product development cycle time, cross functional integration, intra-preneurship and product champions, motivation and performance, financial incentive systems for professionals, dual career ladders for engineers and scientists, communication problems and technological innovation, managing teams (group dynamics and group decision making), leadership in the high technology organization, performance evaluation systems for technical professionals, job design issues for technical support personnel, managing conflict, defending against political behavior, managing stress, organizational development, and TQM.

 

Summary of Grading: In MGT 622 there are two exams. The first test will account for 35% of the course grade and the second test will account for 35%.  In addition, throughout the term small group case analyses will be conducted as class exercises to facilitate the understanding of the concepts discussed in class.  Performance on the group case analyses will receive a weight of 20%. Class participation will account for 10% of the course grade.  In summary:

 

            Test 1            35%

            Test 2            35%

            Cases             20%

            Participation     10%



 

 

 

 

 

 


 

CLASS SCHEDULE

 

 

SESSION

 

DATE

 

TOPIC

 

1

 

5/27

 

Introduction to the management of technical professionals; Factors influencing technological innovation; Organizational design issues in R&D: Functional, project, and matrix structures

 

 

 

2

5/29

Span of control and levels of management; Product development cycle time; Cross functional integration and concurrent engineering

 

3

6/3

Organizational learning; Business process re-engineering; Product champions; Decentralization; Motivation & performance: Higher order needs, Expectancy theory model, Equity theory, reinforcement theory

 

 

 

 

4

 

6/5

 

Financial incentive systems for professionals; Managing turnover among technical professionals; Dual career ladders for engineers & scientists; Communication problems in technology firms

 

 

5

 

6/10

 

Exam #1;

Managing teams: Overcoming problems in group dynamics & group decision making

 

6

6/12

Leadership in the high technology organization; Managerial control & performance evaluation systems for technical professionals

 

 

 

7

6/17

Performance evaluation; Job design issues for technical support personnel

 

8

6/19

Job design, Managing conflict

 

9

6/24

Organizational political behavior; unethical conduct; Managing stress; Organizational development; TQM

 

10

6/26

Exam #2 (6:30pm)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


MGT 622 READING ASSIGNMENTS

 

SESSION 1

Cooper, R., Kleinschmidt, E., “Winning Businesses in New Product Development: The Critical Success Factors,” Research-Technology Management, 50(3), 2007, 52-66.

 

Cooper, R., Edgett, S. and Kleinschmidt, E., “Benchmarking Best NPD Practices,” Research-Technology Management, 47(1), 2004, 31-43.

 

SESSION 2

Glass, J., Ensing, I. and DeSanctis, G., “Managing the Ties between Central R&D and Business Units,” Research-Technology Management, 46(1), 2003, 24-31.

 

Sherman, J. D., “Lessons Learned from the Early Stages of Development of the Guardrail Common Sensor for the Radical Reduction of Cycle Time”, Acquisition Review Quarterly, 10(3) 2003, 300-314.

 

Sherman, J. D., “Patriot PAC-2 Development and Deployment in the Gulf War”, Acquisition Review Quarterly, 10(1), 2003, 29-45.

 

SESSION 3


Bhuiyan, N., Thomson, V. and Gerwin, D., “Implementing Concurrent Engineering,” Research-Technology Management, 49(1), 2006, 38-43.   

 

Sherman, J. D., “Lessons Learned for the Development of the Joint-Stand-Off Target Attack Radar System Common Ground Station,” Defense Acquisition Review Journal, 13(1), 2006, 81-94.

  

Frohman, A., "Personal Initiative Sparks Innovation," Research-Technology Management, 42(3), 1999, 32-38.

 

Kunkel, J., “Rewarding Product Development Success,” Research-Technology Management, 40(5), 1997, 29-31.

 

Rumpel, S. and Medcof, J., “Total Rewards: Good Fit for Tech Workers,” Research-Technology Management, 49(5), 2006, 27-35.  

 

SESSION 4

Risher, H., "Compensating Today's Technical Professional," Research-Technology Management, 43(1), 2000, 50-56.

 

Maidique, M. A., "Duval Plastics Corporation," in Strategic Management of Technology & Innovation, R. Burgelman and M. Maidique, eds., Homewood, IL: Irwin, 2003.

 

Piraino, B. and Lawson, J. "The Irate Customer," Proceedings of the Society for Case Research, 1993.

 

Marx, R., Stubbart, C., Traub, V., and Cavanaugh, M., "The NASA Space Shuttle Disaster," New York: Elsevier, 1987.

 

Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Volume I, Chapter 6: “Decision Making at NASA”, August 2003, 121-131.

 

SESSION 5

EXAM #1

 

Ancona, D. and Caldwell, D. “Improving the Performance of New Product Teams,” Research-Technology Management, 50(5), 2007, 37-43.  

 

GAO, “Best Practices: DOD Teaming Practices not Achieving Potential Results,” Report to the Chairman and Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate, GAO-01-510, 2001.

 

SESSION 6

Kallasvuo, O., et.al., “Moments of Truth: Global Executives Talk about the Challenges that Shaped Them as Leaders,” Harvard Business Review, 85(1), 2007, 15-25.  

 

Souder, W.E. “Supervision: My Supervisor is a Nerd,” Unpublished case.

 

Medcof, J. “CTO Power,” Research-Technology Management, 50(4), 2007, 23-31.

 

Keller, R., “Transformational Leaders Make a Difference”, Research-Technology Management, 38(3), 1995, 41-44.

 

Kane, J.S. and Kane, K.F., “Performance Appraisal,” in Bernardin and Russell, eds., Human Resource Management, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.

 

SESSION 7

Katz, Ralph, “Motivating Technical Professionals Today,” Research-Technology Management, 48(6), 2005, 19-27. 


 

SESSION 8

Yetter, Ed, “Raytheon Company Test Lab Consolidation”, unpublished case, 1998.

 

Maccoby, M., “Creating Moral Organizations,” Research-Technology Management, 48(1), 2005, 59-60.

 

SESSION 9

Pinto, Jeffrey K., “Make Politics Work for You,” Research-Technology Management, 40(1), 1997, 9-10.

 

Sherman, J. Daniel, “Lessons Learned from the Development of the Fiber Optic Guided Missile (FOG-M),” Defense Acquisition Review Journal, 12(4), 2005, 437-451.

 

SESSION 10 

EXAM #2